2009
DOI: 10.37236/268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Packing Graphs Without Cycles of Length up to Five

Abstract: The following statement was conjectured by Faudree, Rousseau, Schelp and Schuster: if a graph $G$ is a non-star graph without cycles of length $m \leq 4$ then $G$ is a subgraph of its complement. So far the best result concerning this conjecture is that every non-star graph $G$ without cycles of length $m \leq 6$ is a subgraph of its complement. In this note we show that $m\leq 6$ can be replaced by $m \leq 5$.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Conjecture 6 is true for sufficiently large planar graphs [6]. On the other hand, the statement from the above conjecture is true if G is a non-star graph of girth at least six [5]. In this paper we prove that the statement is true if the term 'packing' is replaced by the term 'near packing admitting C 1 '.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In particular, Conjecture 6 is true for sufficiently large planar graphs [6]. On the other hand, the statement from the above conjecture is true if G is a non-star graph of girth at least six [5]. In this paper we prove that the statement is true if the term 'packing' is replaced by the term 'near packing admitting C 1 '.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%