1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02510415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on pseudo-symplectic Runge-Kutta methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…h is a symplectic integrator, then ψ E,h is a pseudo-symplectic method [1]. We will denote this class of methods as ψ [2(n+m)] E,h (2n; s; r): an integrator of order 2(n + m) obtained by extrapolation from a basic scheme of order 2n, evaluated s times, and which preserves the geometric character of the solution up to order r. In fact, it is possible to build methods of order 2(n + m) which preserve geometric properties up to order 4(n + m) + 1 simply by canceling r 4n+2j for j = 0, 1, .…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Geometric Integratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…h is a symplectic integrator, then ψ E,h is a pseudo-symplectic method [1]. We will denote this class of methods as ψ [2(n+m)] E,h (2n; s; r): an integrator of order 2(n + m) obtained by extrapolation from a basic scheme of order 2n, evaluated s times, and which preserves the geometric character of the solution up to order r. In fact, it is possible to build methods of order 2(n + m) which preserve geometric properties up to order 4(n + m) + 1 simply by canceling r 4n+2j for j = 0, 1, .…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Geometric Integratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant piecewise continuous polynomial approximation of vorticity is employed to derive Galerkin's system of equations for ψ ij (t). For integration (9.1) we use the pseudo-symplectic integrator by Aubry & Chartier (1998). When a particle leaves D, a new particle with the vorticity equal to its boundary value (2.5) is introduced at ∂D in (with the same y); thus the total number of particles remains constant.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these symplectic integrators are implicit and, in practice, cannot be applied to the problem considered here. In [23,24] explicit methods have been proposed, which preserve the symplecticity with the accuracy higher than the accuracy of the numerical solution itself. In the following section, we present the results of a comparative study of solving Equation (16) by the Runge-Kutta (RK) method of order four and by the pseudo-symplectic method PS36 [23] that has the third-order accuracy of the numerical solution and the sixth-order accuracy in preserving the simplecticity of the system.…”
Section: Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%