2017
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2017023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on semilinear fractional elliptic equation: analysis and discretization

Abstract: In this paper we study existence, regularity, and approximation of solution to a fractional semilinear elliptic equation of order s ∈ (0, 1). We identify minimal conditions on the nonlinear term and the source which leads to existence of weak solutions and uniform L ∞ -bound on the solutions. Next we realize the fractional Laplacian as a Dirichlet-to-Neumann map via the Caffarelli-Silvestre extension. We introduce a firstdegree tensor product finite elements space to approximate the truncated problem. We deriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Theorem 3.7. The proof of this theorem also follows along the lines of the proof of the corresponding result for the case L = −∆ contained in [8,Theorem 2.9]. It can also be obtained by taking u 2 = 0 and z 2 = 0 in the proof of Proposition 3.10 below and in that case the growth condition (3.4) on f is not needed.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof of Theorem 3.7. The proof of this theorem also follows along the lines of the proof of the corresponding result for the case L = −∆ contained in [8,Theorem 2.9]. It can also be obtained by taking u 2 = 0 and z 2 = 0 in the proof of Proposition 3.10 below and in that case the growth condition (3.4) on f is not needed.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We further notice that the results of (ii) can be applied to the classical semilinear problems as well. When a ij = δ ij where the latter denotes the Kronecker delta, we developed a complete analysis, including discretization, and error estimates, for (1.1) in [8]. Such an error analysis can be directly applied to (1.1) under the usual assumptions on Ω and the coefficients a ij .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In equating (21) with (22) as required by the variational problem statement (19), we see that the coefficient vector ξ T −N − · · · ξ T N + ζ T is common to both the left and right hand sides, and may therefore be divided out, thus leaving a N (L + 2) × N (L + 2) system of linear equations for the unknown coefficients v T −N − · · · v T N + w T which holds for all functions {ξ } , ζ ∈ V h . Upon solution of the linear system, aggregation of the coefficient vectors v according to (12) plus the vector w completes the sum v + w, which we recognize as the discrete, approximate solution to the original differential equation (5). Because the matrix in (21) is complex-valued, large and nonsymmetric, the solution strategy for the linear system equating (21) and (22) must be carefully chosen for scalability and economy of compute resources.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) a.e. where T (W ) denotes the solution to(3.2) and U * the solution to the unconstrained problem (3.3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%