2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-011-0470-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the complexity of L p minimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
205
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
205
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, standard interior-point algorithms for solving SDPs will always return the solution with the highest rank [21], which means that they are unlikely to deliver a feasible solution to the rank-constrained problem (8) in general. Thus, it is interesting to ask whether there are other efficient approaches for finding low-rank solutions to the SDP relaxation of (8).…”
Section: Non-convex Optimization Approaches To Network Localization Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, standard interior-point algorithms for solving SDPs will always return the solution with the highest rank [21], which means that they are unlikely to deliver a feasible solution to the rank-constrained problem (8) in general. Thus, it is interesting to ask whether there are other efficient approaches for finding low-rank solutions to the SDP relaxation of (8).…”
Section: Non-convex Optimization Approaches To Network Localization Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work, Ji et al [11] depart from the convex relaxation paradigm and develop a non-convex optimization approach for tackling Problem (8). Such an approach is motivated by ideas from low-rank matrix recovery-a topic that has received significant interest recently; see, e.g., the website [15] and the references therein.…”
Section: Non-convex Optimization Approaches To Network Localization Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though finding the global optimal solution of p minimization is still NP-hard, computing a local minimizer can be done in polynomial time [11]. The global optimality of (3) has been studied and various conditions have been derived, for example, those based on restricted isometry property [7][8][9]12] and null space property [10,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most straightforward approach, optimizing the placement of sensors for a particular task with a well-defined cost function amounts to a combinatorial search. This search is exhaustive and NP-hard, and thus computationally intractable for all but the simplest examples [2,25]. Because of the brute-force nature of this optimization, prospects of scaling to larger systems do not improve with exponentially increasing computational resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%