1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf02489471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the cytology ofFimbristylis umbellaris (Lamk.) Vahl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fusca, F. insignis, F. littoralis, F. ovata, F. thomsonii and F. umbellaris), 20 (F. argentea) and 26 (F. dichotoma). The chromosome counts of F. argentea, F. littoralis and F. ovata conform to Bir et al (1992), Nijalingappa (1975a), Sanyal & Sharma (1972) and Nijalingappa (1975b) respectively, while the chromosome numbers of F. umbellaris differ from Rath & Patnaik, (1977) who reported that the chromosome count is 2n=6. In addition, the chromosome number of F. dichotoma (2n=26) in the present work differs from those previously published (2n=20 (Sanyal & Sharma, 1972), 2n=10 (Sharma & Bal, 1956), 2n=12 (Hsu, 1972), 2n=32 (Subramanian, 1988) and 2n=28 (Saensouk & Saensouk, 2018).…”
Section: Section Trichestylis F Thomsonii Boeckelersupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…fusca, F. insignis, F. littoralis, F. ovata, F. thomsonii and F. umbellaris), 20 (F. argentea) and 26 (F. dichotoma). The chromosome counts of F. argentea, F. littoralis and F. ovata conform to Bir et al (1992), Nijalingappa (1975a), Sanyal & Sharma (1972) and Nijalingappa (1975b) respectively, while the chromosome numbers of F. umbellaris differ from Rath & Patnaik, (1977) who reported that the chromosome count is 2n=6. In addition, the chromosome number of F. dichotoma (2n=26) in the present work differs from those previously published (2n=20 (Sanyal & Sharma, 1972), 2n=10 (Sharma & Bal, 1956), 2n=12 (Hsu, 1972), 2n=32 (Subramanian, 1988) and 2n=28 (Saensouk & Saensouk, 2018).…”
Section: Section Trichestylis F Thomsonii Boeckelersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The somatic chromosome number for the species is 2n=10, which contrasts with Rath and Patnaik, (1977), who suggested that chromosome number of F. umbellaris is 2n= 6. F. umbellaris has eight median (m) and two submedian (sm) chromosomes.…”
Section: F Umbellaris (Lam) Vahlmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…(n = 31;Hoshino, 1987). But, the reduction below the probable basic chromosome number (x = 5) also happens in Cyperaceae via dysploidy, such as n = 2 in Rhynchospora (Vanzela et al, 1996) and n = 3 in both Eleocharis (Da Silva et al, 2005) and Fimbristylis Vahl (Rath and Patnaik, 1977). Lower numbers have also been reported in other holocentric families, such as Juncaceae (Malheiros et al, 1947), Droseraceae (Kondo et al, 1994) and Convolvulaceae (Pazy and Plitmann, 1987;Pazy and Plitmann, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%