1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf02575586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the derivation of maximal common subgraphs of two directed or undirected graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related work may be found in [1,2,3,4,7,8,16,14,17]. These techniques are not applicable to MCCS detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work may be found in [1,2,3,4,7,8,16,14,17]. These techniques are not applicable to MCCS detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Definition 3, G C can be computed based on maximal clique detection. 19 In GDM(), the possible operands are any types of graphs (i.e., BG, RAG or STRG).…”
Section: Gdm()mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a simple comparison between a pair of chemical graphs consisting of m and n atoms, respectively, the maximum number of possible atom-by-atom comparisons necessary to determine all common subgraphs consisting of k atoms is [32] !…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that Levi [32], later used by Cone [10] in a chemical context, was the first to suggest reducing the MCIS problem to the maximum clique problem in the published literature, but it has been independently discovered by numerous authors, including Barrow and Burstall [34] and Vizing [35]. In a related work, Kozen transformed the problem of isomorphism to clique detection in a compatibility graph that he labeled an M-graph [36].…”
Section: Maximum Clique-based Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation