1992
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1992.9988811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the generalizability of assortative mating coefficients for personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, researchers have examined similarity versus complementarity on a vast array of variables, including age, race, education, height, weight, physical attractiveness, alcohol consumption, smoking, antisocial behavior, mood and anxiety disorders, intelligence and other cognitive abilities, religiousness, political attitudes, values, and a wide range of personality traits. Although the results are complex and correlations often differ widely across studies (Nicholson, 1992), the accumulating data overwhelmingly support the existence of positive assortment, with very little evidence of complementarity (e.g., Bouchard & Loehlin, 2001; Buss, 1984; Eysenck, 1990; Mathews & Reus, 2001; Vandenburg, 1972).…”
Section: Prior Evidence Of Assortative Matingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, researchers have examined similarity versus complementarity on a vast array of variables, including age, race, education, height, weight, physical attractiveness, alcohol consumption, smoking, antisocial behavior, mood and anxiety disorders, intelligence and other cognitive abilities, religiousness, political attitudes, values, and a wide range of personality traits. Although the results are complex and correlations often differ widely across studies (Nicholson, 1992), the accumulating data overwhelmingly support the existence of positive assortment, with very little evidence of complementarity (e.g., Bouchard & Loehlin, 2001; Buss, 1984; Eysenck, 1990; Mathews & Reus, 2001; Vandenburg, 1972).…”
Section: Prior Evidence Of Assortative Matingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because no previous investigation has provided a suitable examination of the full range of individual differences variables within a single analysis, the relevant evidence must be pieced together from different studies. This, in turn, makes it difficult to compare assort-ative mating correlations across these different domains (see Nicholson, 1992). That is, any observed differences in the level of positive assortment may reflect differences in sampling or other designrelated features, rather than true differences in partner similarity.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Available Evidence And Goals Of The Currementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Human assortative mating in which people select mates with similar personality could maintain variation in human personality, but the data on the reality of this phenomenon are inconsistent (Russell and Wells, 1991;Nicholson, 1992;Lykken and Tellegen, 1993;Glicksohn and Golan, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%