2013
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v18-2116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the Gromov-Hausdorff-Prokhorov distance between (locally) compact metric measure spaces

Abstract: We present an extension of the Gromov-Hausdorff metric on the set of compact metric spaces: the Gromov-Hausdorff-Prokhorov metric on the set of compact metric spaces endowed with a finite measure. We then extend it to the non-compact case by describing a metric on the set of rooted complete locally compact length spaces endowed with a locally finite measure. We prove that this space with the extended Gromov-Hausdorff-Prokhorov metric is a Polish space. This generalization is needed to define Lévy trees, which … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
412
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(416 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
412
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let truefrakturS¯ be the space of equivalence classes of compact metric measure spaces and trued¯GHP be the induced metric. Then by , false(truefrakturS¯,trued¯GHPfalse) is a complete separable metric space. Sometimes we will be interested in not just one metric space but an infinite sequence of metric spaces.…”
Section: Definitions and Limit Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let truefrakturS¯ be the space of equivalence classes of compact metric measure spaces and trued¯GHP be the induced metric. Then by , false(truefrakturS¯,trued¯GHPfalse) is a complete separable metric space. Sometimes we will be interested in not just one metric space but an infinite sequence of metric spaces.…”
Section: Definitions and Limit Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…then we show in Theorem 5.1 the convergence for the Gromov-Hausdorff-Prohorov distance defined in [4] of τ θ (λ) to T θ as λ goes to infinity. This result was already in [14] (with the Gromov-Hausdorff distance instead of the Gromov-Hausdorff-Prohorov distance), and this ensures that in the super-critical case the Lévy trees introduced in [14] and in [1] are the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Under N ψ , the convergence (42) is a consequence of Lemma 5.4 (see also Proposition 2.8 in [4] to get the d GHP convergence from the d c GHP convergence) for the (sub)critical case and Lemma 5.5 for the super-critical case. Then the P ψ r -a.s. convergence is a consequence of the representation of P ψ r from Section 2.7.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Sub-tree Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This point of view enables us to take scaling limits in the sense of the Gromov-HausdorffProkhorov distance, see e.g. [ADH13]. For example, if (T n , d n , µ n ) is a uniform random tree on n vertices, then we have the convergence in distribution [Ald91a, LG05]:…”
Section: On the Formalism Chosen For Graph Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%