2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-005-4997-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the scheduling with two families of jobs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper seeks to present general methods to treat the single-machine multi-agent scheduling problem. The results presented in this paper embrace some of the results on single-machine two-agent scheduling reported in the literature (Agnetis et al (2004), Baker and Smith (2003), and Yuan et al (2005)). …”
Section: Introduction and Problem Formulationsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper seeks to present general methods to treat the single-machine multi-agent scheduling problem. The results presented in this paper embrace some of the results on single-machine two-agent scheduling reported in the literature (Agnetis et al (2004), Baker and Smith (2003), and Yuan et al (2005)). …”
Section: Introduction and Problem Formulationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The following observation, which holds for two-agent scheduling (see Baker and Smith (2003), and Yuan et al (2005)), still holds for multi-agent scheduling.…”
Section: Polynomial-time Algorithms For Special Modelsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, other -less employed-names have been suggested, such as 'competing users' (Shen, 1998;Agnetis et al, 2000), 'customers' (Baker and Smith, 2003), 'multiple job classes' (Soltani et al, 2010), 'multi-users' (Saule and Trystram, 2009), 'two families of jobs' (Yuan et al, 2005), 'mixed criteria scheduling problem' (Meiners and Torng, 2007), or even 'scheduling problem with a floating machine non-availability interval' (Kellerer and Strusevich, 2010), motivated by the fact that there is a machine maintenance interval which is not fixed. Finally, Arbib et al (2004) do not give a name for the problem.…”
Section: Fields Of Application and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leung et al (2010) generalised the results for some two-agent problems and solved one open problem involving identical parallel machines. For more results on multi-agent scheduling, the reader may refer to Yuan et al (2005), Ng et al (2006), Wan et al (2010), Cheng et al (2011aCheng et al ( , 2011b, Liu et al (2010Liu et al ( , 2011, Mosheiov (2010, 2011), Nong et al (2011), Li and Hsu (2012), and Yin et al (2012), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%