2016
DOI: 10.21031/epod.88204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on the Use of Item Parceling in Structural Equation Modeling with Missing Data

Abstract: Item parceling procedure may be applied to alleviate some difficulties in analysis with missing data and/or nonnormal data in structural equation modeling. A simulation study was conducted to investigate how item parceling behaves under various conditions in structural equation model with missing and nonnormal distributed data. Design factors included missing mechanism, percentage of missingness, distribution of item data, and sample size. Results showed that analysis conducted at the parcel level yielded lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach is using Multiple Imputation (MI) to estimate missing data. Finally, when data are MNAR, item parcels may be useful (see Orcan, 2013); though for the novice practitioner, SEM would not be recommended (Allison, 2003).…”
Section: Data-related Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is using Multiple Imputation (MI) to estimate missing data. Finally, when data are MNAR, item parcels may be useful (see Orcan, 2013); though for the novice practitioner, SEM would not be recommended (Allison, 2003).…”
Section: Data-related Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLR (e.g., full information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation method also works well with missing data (Orcan, 2013 All variables were significant except for Masculine. That is, the distribution shapes of the variables were significantly different from a normal distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Before fitting the hypothesized structural model, the measurement model was evaluated to ensure that all six latent variables were adequately represented by their items or subscales (parcels). Use of item parceling for a subscale in structural equation modeling yields as good as or slightly better results than does the use of item level as an indicator [40,43]. The six latent factors were allowed to co-vary, where SC productivity was represented by 4 items, SC self-efficacy was represented by 3 subscales, SC mentoring practices by 3 subscales, science identity by 4 items, SC outcome expectations by 5 items, and career intention by 2 items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%