2017
DOI: 10.31390/cosa.11.3.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Time-Dependent Additive Functionals

Abstract: This note develops shortly the theory of time-inhomogeneous additive functionals and is a useful support for the analysis of time-dependent Markov processes and related topics. It is a significant tool for the analysis of BSDEs in law. In particular we extend to a non-homogeneous setup some results concerning the quadratic variation and the angular bracket of Martingale Additive Functionals (in short MAF) associated to a homogeneous Markov processes.MSC 2010. 60J55; 60J35; 60G07; 60G44.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pro o . Moreover, if we fix (s, η) ∈ R + × Ω, reasoning exactly as in the proof of Proposition 4.13 in [5] we see that t →k n,m (s, η, t) is right-continuous, which by Lemma 4.12 in [5] implies the joint measurability ofk n,m .…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pro o . Moreover, if we fix (s, η) ∈ R + × Ω, reasoning exactly as in the proof of Proposition 4.13 in [5] we see that t →k n,m (s, η, t) is right-continuous, which by Lemma 4.12 in [5] implies the joint measurability ofk n,m .…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For the rest of the proof, 0 ≤ t < u are fixed. Following the same proof than that of Lemma 4.9 in [5] but with parameter (s, x) replaced with (s, η), we obtain the following. Similarly to what we did with the quadratic variation in Proposition 4.6, we start noticing that for any η ∈ Ω, being (A t,η u − A t,η t ) F t,η u -measurable, there exists by Corollary 3.21 an F o u -measurable r.v.…”
Section: A Proofs Of Sectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For details concerning the exact mathematical framework for our Markov process, we refer to our previous paper [7] about canonical Markov classes and additive functionals.…”
Section: Martingale Problem and Canonical Markov Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From now on, E is a Polish space and Ω, F , (X t ) t∈[0,T ] , (F t ) t∈[0,T ] denotes the canonical space defined in Notation 3.1 of [7]. We also fix a canonical Markov class (È s,x ) (s,x)∈[0,T ]×E associated to a transition kernel P = (P s,t ) measurable in time as defined in Definitions 3.4, 3.5 and 3.7 in [7].…”
Section: Martingale Problem and Canonical Markov Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%