Array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) has recently lead to the characterization of many novel microdeletion and microduplication syndromes; it has revolutionized the genetic testing available for patients with learning disabilities, who have the ''chromosomal phenotype'' with dysmorphic features and multiple anomalies [Slavotinek, 2008]. Chromosome duplications involving 1p are rarely reported (fewer than 20 patients in the literature) and a distinct phenotype has yet to be defined; patients appear to have short survival, as well as impaired development and congenital malformations, such as congenital heart defects [Lennon et al., 2006]. Among the reported duplicated 1p cases, the variable phenotypic expressivity likely reflects the variation of the duplicated 1p segments.Here we report on a case of duplication of 1p with novel phenotypic and developmental features. During the pregnancy there were threats of miscarriage. He was born at 40 weeks gestation by a normal vaginal delivery with APGAR scores of 9 and 10. Birth weight was 2,950 g (10th-25th centile), length was 50 cm (25th-50th centile), and occipitofrontal head circumference was 34.7 cm (25th-50th centile). Walking independently occurred when he was 1 year old. Since the first year of life, he had difficulty with establishing relationships, as well as psychomotor and language retardation. Astigmatism was diagnosed at 4 years. At 5 years he had a reduction in growth parameters, so the following tests were performed, with normal results: anti-gliadin IgA and IgG, antiendomysium IgA and IgG, free and total T4, T3, TSH, and allergy skin prick testing. Additional normal studies included mutation analysis of the FMR1 gene and urine amino acids, organic acids, and reducing substances. Abdominal ultrasonography showed slight hepatosplenomegaly. EEG during sleep and awake was unremarkable, and IQ was 50. Karyotype was 46,XY; left-hand bone age was 17, according to the Tanner-Whitehouse 2 standards. His family history was negative for mental retardation, behavior anomalies, or birth defects; his parents were nonconsanguineous.He was first evaluated by us at age 17 years. Physical exam showed the following: scant adipose tissue, narrow forehead, small receding chin, prominent nasal bridge, flat nose, short philtrum, midface hypoplasia (Fig. 1), arachnodactyly of the fingers (Fig. 2), and fingers and toes with joint hyperlaxity. A left-hand bone age was equivalent to his chronological age. He had stereotyped movements, such as finger snapping and repeated mannerisms with obsessive-compulsive behavior; his full-scale IQ was 64, with a range between 56 (performance IQ) and 76 (verbal IQ). The psychological profile was compatible with an autism spectrum disorder with mild mental deficiency, based on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) module 4. A brain MRI scan was normal.An array-CGH analysis was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions: DNA of the proband and a control were extracted with a Puregene DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra ...