2012 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/indcon.2012.6420763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel algorithm for detection and removal of random valued impulse noise using cardinal splines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original graphic figures have been taken from [7]. Figures 3, 4 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, the first graphic (a), is that which is recovered using the algorithm for random valued impulse noise removal in [5]. The second graphic (b) is the zoomed version of the first.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original graphic figures have been taken from [7]. Figures 3, 4 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, the first graphic (a), is that which is recovered using the algorithm for random valued impulse noise removal in [5]. The second graphic (b) is the zoomed version of the first.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spline interpolation has been extensively used in reconstruction techniques [4,5,8]. The meshes with the rugged topology in this paper were generated by using the denoising algorithm proposed by Bodduna et al in [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B-Splines are used for interpolation because they have compact support passes through control point and have local propagation property. The idea of interpolation has been taken from Kireeti Bodduna and Rajesh Siddavatam [10] where they have applied the below methodology to solve the problem of random valued Impulse Noise removal using Cardinal Spline Interpolation [10].…”
Section: Proposed B-spline Interpolation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be broadly classified into two categories i.e. salt and pepper noise because the noisy pixel candidate can take value either 0 (darkest) or 255 (brightest) and random valued impulse noise in which noisy pixel candidate can take value varying in the range of 0-255 [6], making it hard to detect because in local neighborhood difference between noisy and noise free pixels are not significant and also, its existence cannot be determined by image histogram [7]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%