2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach for honey pollen profile assessment using an electronic tongue and chemometric tools

Abstract: Nowadays the main honey producing countries require accurate labeling of honey before commercialization, including floral classification. Traditionally, this classification is made by melissopalynology analysis, an accurate but time-consuming task requiring laborious sample pre-treatment and high-skilled technicians. In this work the potential use of a potentiometric electronic tongue for pollinic assessment is evaluated, using monofloral and polyfloral honeys. The results showed that after splitting honeys ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) included two home-made print-screen potentiometric arrays each one with 20 cross-sensitivity membranes as chemical sensors (diameter: 3.6 mm; thickness: 0.3 mm). As previously described by Dias et al [30], a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) board was covered with a sticker (on both sides) with the printed scheme of the limits of the multi-sensor system (negative scheme), which was covered with a silver epoxy resin (EPO-TEK E4110) and dried overnight in an oven at 40°C. After that, the sticker was removed, leaving the printed scheme (positive scheme) on the PVC board.…”
Section: E-tongue Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) included two home-made print-screen potentiometric arrays each one with 20 cross-sensitivity membranes as chemical sensors (diameter: 3.6 mm; thickness: 0.3 mm). As previously described by Dias et al [30], a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) board was covered with a sticker (on both sides) with the printed scheme of the limits of the multi-sensor system (negative scheme), which was covered with a silver epoxy resin (EPO-TEK E4110) and dried overnight in an oven at 40°C. After that, the sticker was removed, leaving the printed scheme (positive scheme) on the PVC board.…”
Section: E-tongue Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) included two homemade print-screen potentiometric arrays covered with an acrylic resin (PLASTIK 70) for ensuring a waterproof surface. As previously described (Dias et al, 2015;Veloso et al, 2018), each polyvinyl chloride (PVC) board (3 cm × 12 cm) had 20 wells (3.6 mm of diameter and 0.3 mm of thickness), where 20 cross-sensitivity lipid polymeric membranes were applied, using a drop-by-drop technique. The polymeric membranes had different combinations of 4 lipid additives (∼3%: octadecylamine, oleyl alcohol, methyltrioctylammonium chloride or oleic acid), 5 plasticizers (∼32%: bis(1-butylpentyl) adipate, dibutyl sebacate, 2-nitrophenyl-octylether, tris(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate or dioctyl phenylphosphonate) and PVC (∼65%), which were used as chemical sensors (Fluka, minimum purity ≥97%).…”
Section: E-tongue Device and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E-tongue device was designed and constructed as previously described [22,23]. The device comprised two homemade print-screen potentiometric arrays (3 cm × 12 cm visible PVC sheet plus 5 cm due to the RS232 plug; Fig.…”
Section: E-tongue Device and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%