2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2014.6943780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach to quantification of real and artifactual components of current density imaging for phantom and live heart

Abstract: Spatial distribution of injected current in a subject could be calculated and visualized through current density imaging (CDI). Calculated CDI paths however have a limited degree of accuracy due to both avoidable methodological errors and inevitable limitations dictated by MR imaging constraints. The source and impact of these limitations are scrutinized in this paper. Quantification of such limitations is an essential step prior to passing any judgment about the results especially in biomedical applications. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Correlation of structural data obtained by DTI imaging and dynamic CDI data for the first time [73,74] • Improved post processing of the CDI imaging [75][76][77], and…”
Section: Proposed Approaches and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Correlation of structural data obtained by DTI imaging and dynamic CDI data for the first time [73,74] • Improved post processing of the CDI imaging [75][76][77], and…”
Section: Proposed Approaches and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNR in magnitude MRI images has been assumed to have Gaussian distribution [79] and SNR measures have been developed by Firbank et al [127]. We performed noise analysis experiments on phantom and pig heart and studied the contribution of current injection to the level of noise [76]. In this work, a baseline analysis method was suggested, which adds the phase changes from two phase cycles instead of subtracting them.…”
Section: Quantifying Current Injection Effect On Noise Level In CDImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can verify the distribution of noise in the phantom by performing a baseline analysis. 21 In this case, we record real and imaginary images twice when there is no current in each orientation. The current is then calculated by considering repeated images in each orientation as two phase cycles of the CDI method.…”
Section: Distribution Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current is then calculated by considering repeated images in each orientation as two phase cycles of the CDI method. 21 The resulting current density map in A∕m 2 and its histogram are shown in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b).…”
Section: Distribution Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%