2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel bias correction framework of TMPA 3B42 daily precipitation data using similarity matrix/homogeneous conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that the trends detected among the three datasets were generally similar for extreme precipitation events on a regional scale, showing that the trends detected from the meteorological station data were reasonable. Meanwhile, the differences in trends detected from the three datasets indicated that the accuracy of satellite observations needs to be improved to trace the magnitude of extreme precipitation events, using ground measurements for correction [43,44]. trends detected from the meteorological station data were reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings indicate that the trends detected among the three datasets were generally similar for extreme precipitation events on a regional scale, showing that the trends detected from the meteorological station data were reasonable. Meanwhile, the differences in trends detected from the three datasets indicated that the accuracy of satellite observations needs to be improved to trace the magnitude of extreme precipitation events, using ground measurements for correction [43,44]. trends detected from the meteorological station data were reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…trends detected from the meteorological station data were reasonable. Meanwhile, the differences in trends detected from the three datasets indicated that the accuracy of satellite observations needs to be improved to trace the magnitude of extreme precipitation events, using ground measurements for correction [43,44]. .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have attempted to reduce the errors in satellite precipitation retrievals by considering only seasonal rainfall intensity and/or topographic factors in their error adjustment models or blending algorithms (e.g., Tian et al, 2010b;Hashemi et al, 2017;Bhuiyan et al, 2018;Le et al, 2018;Choubin et al, 2019;Shen et al, 2019;Baez-Villanueva et al, 2020). In practice, the errors show significant regional features (at least for the three evaluated SPPs).…”
Section: Potential Methods Of Improving Satellite Retrieval Algorithms and Error Adjustment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed knowledge of rainfall characteristics, i.e., rainfall intensity, is essential to evaluate remotely sensed rainfall estimates (Mandapaka and Qin 2013). It is important to provide nature and characteristics of rainfall and better prediction of hydrologic response in watersheds and urban areas (Chen et al 2016) since rainfall exhibit different mean value and variability at daily time series (Choubin et al 2019). The error estimation of satellite-based rainfall in frequencies and intensities of daily precipitation influences the simulation result of surface water, sub-surface water, evapotranspiration, and different amounts and proportion of simulated water balance components (Luo et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%