2018
DOI: 10.2217/epi-2018-0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Cell-Type Deconvolution Algorithm Reveals Substantial Contamination by Immune Cells in Saliva, Buccal and Cervix

Abstract: The degree and variation of IC contamination in complex epithelial tissues is substantial. We provide a valuable resource and tool for assessing the epithelial purity and IC contamination of samples and for identifying differential methylation in such complex tissues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
186
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
186
1
Order By: Relevance
“…hypomethylated in one and hypermethylated in another) ( Fig.1d ), and which may not be identifiable by current state-of-the-art DMC calling algorithms (see later). To estimate cell-type fractions, CellDMC applies our previously validated EpiDISH algorithm 16 in an iterative hierarchical procedure, called HEpiDISH 17 , which leads to improved cell-type fraction estimates in complex tissues by recognizing that cell-types are naturally arranged along a developmental tree ( Online Methods, SI fig.S2 ). In the context of epithelial tissues, HEpiDISH accomplishes this by using two distinct DNAm reference matrices, a primary reference matrix for the estimation of total epithelial, total fibroblast and total immune-cell (IC) fractions, and a separate, secondary, non-overlapping DNAm reference for the estimation of underlying IC cell subtype fractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hypomethylated in one and hypermethylated in another) ( Fig.1d ), and which may not be identifiable by current state-of-the-art DMC calling algorithms (see later). To estimate cell-type fractions, CellDMC applies our previously validated EpiDISH algorithm 16 in an iterative hierarchical procedure, called HEpiDISH 17 , which leads to improved cell-type fraction estimates in complex tissues by recognizing that cell-types are naturally arranged along a developmental tree ( Online Methods, SI fig.S2 ). In the context of epithelial tissues, HEpiDISH accomplishes this by using two distinct DNAm reference matrices, a primary reference matrix for the estimation of total epithelial, total fibroblast and total immune-cell (IC) fractions, and a separate, secondary, non-overlapping DNAm reference for the estimation of underlying IC cell subtype fractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although highly consistent and expected given the analogous observations made at the bulk level (see e.g. 37, 51 ), it is not automatic that bulk and single-cell results would agree so well given the confounding effects of cell-type heterogeneity in bulk samples, specially in a tissue like lung where over 40% of cells are stromal cells 60 . Many of the lung-specific TFs, which SCIRA predicts to be inactivated in lung tumor epithelial cells (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Importantly, a second limma analysis is performed by comparing the tissue of interest to individual tissue types if these contain cells that are believed to significantly infiltrate and contaminate the tissue of interest. Thus, in the case of liver we perform two limma analyses: comparing liver to all other tissue-types, and separately, liver to only blood, since blood contains immune cells which are known to infiltrate liver tissue accounting for approximately 40% of all cells found in liver 60 . We require a liver-specific TF to be one with significantly higher expression in both comparisons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of our samples are from blood, and we observed a significant improvement in the prediction results for the samples from saliva when more blood samples were included in the training set (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 1) . This increase is expected since samples from saliva were reported to exhibit more than 80% contamination by immune cells 27 . To quantify whether our predictor has a good performance in non-blood tissues, we downloaded 13 data sets (Supplementary Table 4) that contain samples from other tissues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%