2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel computer-based method for measuring the acetabular angle on hip radiographs

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to propose a new computer based method for measuring acetabular angles on hip radiographs and to assess its practicality, sensitivity and reliability for acetabular angle measurement.MethodsA total of 314 acetabulum were assessed on 157 pelvic X-ray images. Acetabular angles were measured with both the conventional method (Method 1) and our proposed method (Method 2). All the Acetabular Index (AI) angle, Acetabular Angle (AA) and Acetabular Center (ACM) angle were measured wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows some of the related results in the literature. In Sahin et al [ 24 ], comparing means is not a valid accuracy metric, as it does not compare individual measurements to the corresponding gold standard. Liu et al [ 25 ] report a 94.68% F1 score, however, this is done for the heavy dislocation case based on their approach for measuring the AA index, and it is not clear what gold standard did they compare to given that they compared their results to a doctor with/without the aid of a computer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 shows some of the related results in the literature. In Sahin et al [ 24 ], comparing means is not a valid accuracy metric, as it does not compare individual measurements to the corresponding gold standard. Liu et al [ 25 ] report a 94.68% F1 score, however, this is done for the heavy dislocation case based on their approach for measuring the AA index, and it is not clear what gold standard did they compare to given that they compared their results to a doctor with/without the aid of a computer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, the ResNet50 model was used for classification. Sahin et al [ 24 ] constructed a model template image based on expert opinion and used comparisons with that template to find the best fitting (i.e., diagnosis). However, this type of method depends on the quality, scale, rotation, and shape of the pelvic image being similar to the template.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hip radiography is a convenient diagnostic tool since it is available in most hospitals and clinics. However, the diagnostic accuracy of hip radiography for DDH varies according to the interpreter’s experience 6 . DDH is a relatively rare disease; in fact, a Japanese study revealed that 32% of orthopedic doctors were yet to encounter a patient with DDH in their career as at the time of the study 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anteroposterior (AP) view, frog-leg lateral view, or von Rosen view can be used for the diagnosis of DDH; however, the hip AP view is usually sufficient for screening DDH ( 5 ). The diagnostic performance of conventional radiography for the detection of DDH in infants can vary according to several factors such as the patient's age, technical adequacy, and reader's experience ( 6 ). In particular, the interpreter's experience can significantly affect the diagnostic accuracy of conventional radiography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%