2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06331-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel CT-based radiomics in the distinction of severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia

Abstract: Background Convenient and precise assessment of the severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) contributes to the timely patient treatment and prognosis improvement. We aimed to evaluate the ability of CT-based radiomics nomogram in discriminating the severity of patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia. Methods A total of 150 patients (training cohort n = 105; test cohort n = 45) with COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain react… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies were excluded from the analysis as follows: one observational study [ 24 ], which used a repetitive patient population, one observational study [ 15 ], which used pulmonary opacities on chest images to predict disease severity, and two observational studies [ 25 , 26 ], which used other severity assessment protocols to predict disease outcome. Finally, eight articles were used for qualitative analysis [ 27 34 ]. Only seven reports were included in the meta-analysis as a study by Li et al [ 34 ] was excluded because only patients with severe COVID-19 were included in the report.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies were excluded from the analysis as follows: one observational study [ 24 ], which used a repetitive patient population, one observational study [ 15 ], which used pulmonary opacities on chest images to predict disease severity, and two observational studies [ 25 , 26 ], which used other severity assessment protocols to predict disease outcome. Finally, eight articles were used for qualitative analysis [ 27 34 ]. Only seven reports were included in the meta-analysis as a study by Li et al [ 34 ] was excluded because only patients with severe COVID-19 were included in the report.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these works, many researches [22][23][24][25] focused on the lesions, not used the patients as subjects. Their socalled thousands of cases were actually thousands of lesions; many researches [26][27][28][29][30][31] built models to predict the COVID-19 patients' current severity status, not the potential severe risk. There were also some works [32][33][34] similar to our work in research ideas and methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the variation caused by different CT scanners acquisition parameters, all images were resampled to the same voxel size (1mm*1mm*1mm) with the linear interpolation method ( 20 ). The volumes of interest (VOIs) of lesion areas were segmented by a radiologist (a 2-year work experience) semi-automatically with ITK-SNAP software (version 3.8.itksnap.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%