Fifth International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing (ARTCom 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2013.2205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel dead end and packet loss avoidance scheme for geographic forwarding in manets

Abstract: Routing has always been one of the key challenges in mobile ad hoc networks. Ad hoc networks prefer reactive routing over proactive routing due to the rapid changes in nodes position. Geographic position based routing is a convenient method to route a packet from a source to a destination based on the local information alone. Geographic forwarding implements a greedy routing technique that selects a forwarding node that is closer to the destination than itself. If this fails the packet is trapped in a dead end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the protocols takes the shortest path to forward the data packet, however, selection of the shortest path is not always feasible due to swift vehicle topology changes with short link lifetime. Morover, a number of protocols follows greedy forward approach which may results in dead end (Bazzi et al 2017;Muralidhar and Geethanjali 2013). Current routing protocols of VANETs can be classified into following different categories based on the type of information needed: Positions based protocols, geographical based protocols, map based protocols, road based protocols and topology based protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the protocols takes the shortest path to forward the data packet, however, selection of the shortest path is not always feasible due to swift vehicle topology changes with short link lifetime. Morover, a number of protocols follows greedy forward approach which may results in dead end (Bazzi et al 2017;Muralidhar and Geethanjali 2013). Current routing protocols of VANETs can be classified into following different categories based on the type of information needed: Positions based protocols, geographical based protocols, map based protocols, road based protocols and topology based protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%