2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel differential evolution algorithm using local abstract convex underestimate strategy for global optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the difference of MaxFEs between high-dimensional functions set and low-dimensional functions set, the results of mean FEs and SR under predefined accuracy level (Threshold) are divided into two tables. The results of mean FEs and SR are summarized in Tables S-8 x is the global optimum, the threshold is set to 1.00e-5 [90], except for f 07 and f 08 . The thresholds of f 07 and f 08 are set to 1.00e-2 and 1.00e-3, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Convergence Speed and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the difference of MaxFEs between high-dimensional functions set and low-dimensional functions set, the results of mean FEs and SR under predefined accuracy level (Threshold) are divided into two tables. The results of mean FEs and SR are summarized in Tables S-8 x is the global optimum, the threshold is set to 1.00e-5 [90], except for f 07 and f 08 . The thresholds of f 07 and f 08 are set to 1.00e-2 and 1.00e-3, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Convergence Speed and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholds of f 07 and f 08 are set to 1.00e-2 and 1.00e-3, respectively. For low-dimensional functions, the threshold is set to 1.00e-5 [90], except for f 17 and f 19 , whose thresholds are 1.00e-3 and 1.00e-4, respectively. The stopping criterion is satisfied when the best fitness value reaches to the predefined threshold value or the number of FEs reaches to MaxFEs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Convergence Speed and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DE and its variants stand out as very competitive optimizers that have been successfully used to solve many real-world engineering problems [22]. DE is known for its simple structure, ease of use, robustness, and speed [23]. Many attempts have been made to improve DE's performance, two recent and efficient ones being Success-History based parameter Adaptation DE (SHADE) [24] and its improved variant L-SHADE [25].…”
Section: Shade and L-shade Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential evolution (DE), which was first proposed by Storn and Price (1997), is one of the most powerful evolutionary algorithms for global numerical optimization. The advantages of DE are its ease of use, simple structure, speed, efficiency and robustness (Wei et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2016). Recently, DE has been successfully applied in diverse domains (Rajesh et al, 2016;Malathy et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%