2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel electrochemical hybrid platform for sensitive determination of the aminoglycoside antibiotic Kasugamycin residues in vegetables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as 2.55 μM by the formula LOD = 3 σ / s , where σ is the standard deviation of the blank and s is the slope of the calibration curve. 44,45…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as 2.55 μM by the formula LOD = 3 σ / s , where σ is the standard deviation of the blank and s is the slope of the calibration curve. 44,45…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as 2.55 μM by the formula LOD = 3σ/s, where σ is the standard deviation of the blank and s is the slope of the calibration curve. 44,45 In comparison with other reported methods (Table S1 †) for the detection of trilobatin, the sensor based on poly-L-cys/ AuNBs/GCE exhibited wide linear ranges and a low detection limit.…”
Section: Detection Of Trilobatin On Poly-l-cys/aunbs/gcementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were found to be 0.17 nM (0.06 μg l −1 ) and 0.48 nM (0.18 μg l −1 ), respectively based on the following equations LOD = 3 S/b and LOQ = 10 S/b where S is the standard deviation of the intercept and b is the slope of calibration plot. 57,58 Repeatability, which describes the ability of a technique to give the same result at the same conditions of the measurement, 59,60 was examined for AuNPs/poly(CR)/GCE by recording six successive DPV determinations of 1 μM FAM using the same sensor and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the results obtained was found to be 2.63%. While reproducibility, representing the possibility of getting the same results of a measurement on changing the time and/ or the place of the measurement was verified for AuNPs/poly(CR)/ GCE through preparing three different modified sensors, 38,61 followed by testing their DPV response for a solution that is 100 μM FAM, and the RSD was found to be 1.51%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, electrochemical biosensors are robust, cost-effective, offer rapid analysis, require less sample volume, and display excellent disposability and ease of analysis. Moreover, they can be miniaturized into portable handheld devices, which increases their applicability in real-time monitoring and on-site detection [ 166 , 167 , 168 ]. Thus, enormous efforts have been dedicated towards the design and development of novel electrochemical biosensors, due to which significant advances have recently taken place in the field of electrochemical biosensing, aptasensing, and immunosensing.…”
Section: Summary and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%