2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel hybrid social media platform selection model using fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…-Hashemkhani Zolfani et al (2012) utilized a hybrid AHP and COPRAS-G based MCDM model for supplier selection. - Tavana et al (2013) proposed the fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the COPRAS-G method, in determine the weight of the social media platform selection criteria in a fuzzy environment and select the most suitable social media platform. - Aghdaie et al (2013a) presents a novel approach, which integrates fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), and COPRAS-G method for market segment evaluation and selection.…”
Section: Copras-g Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-Hashemkhani Zolfani et al (2012) utilized a hybrid AHP and COPRAS-G based MCDM model for supplier selection. - Tavana et al (2013) proposed the fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the COPRAS-G method, in determine the weight of the social media platform selection criteria in a fuzzy environment and select the most suitable social media platform. - Aghdaie et al (2013a) presents a novel approach, which integrates fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), and COPRAS-G method for market segment evaluation and selection.…”
Section: Copras-g Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fuzzy AHP based grey relational analysis (Golmohammadi, Parast 2012), fuzzy ANP based COPRAS-G (Tavana et al 2013;Nguyen et al 2014), fuzzy AHP based CORPAS-G (Aghdaie et al 2013a). In the current study, we propose a new hybrid decision model for the supplier selection based on the fuzzy-Rasch model (Huang, Peng 2012;Chatterjee, Kar 2013b) for assessing risk attributes weight and COPRAS-G method (Zavadskas et al 2008) for ranking of alternative suppliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laarhoven and Pedrycz (1983) have first used FAHP by adapting the TFN of the FST (Bulut et al 2012). Fuzzy sets and FAHP extent analysis method are as follows (Tavana et al 2013;Aghdaie et al 2013;Ecer 2015). A fuzzy number is a special fuzzy set…”
Section: The Fuzzy Ahp (Fahp) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDM methods can help to improve the quality of decisions by making the decision-making process more explicit, rational and efficient (Lourenzutti & Krohling, 2013;Podvezko & Sivilevičius, 2013;Tavana et al, 2013;Chai et al, 2013;Ruzgys et al, 2014). An intriguing problem with MCDM methods which rank a set of alternatives in terms of a number of competing criteria is that oftentimes different MCDM methods may yield different rank orders when they are fed with exactly the same numerical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%