2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20164206004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Image Noise Level Function Estimation Approach using Camera Response Function Constraint

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we propose a noise level evaluation method for real captured photos. Different from conventional noise removal methods that assume noise follow a simply additive Gaussian distribution, noise distribution in our method is supposed to be a more sophisticated intensity-dependent distribution, which has a better fit with actual noise model. Follow the definition of noise level function (NLF) which represents the variation of the standard deviation of noise with respect to image intensity. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24] To account for nonlinear camera processes that affect noise statistics, [25] some works employ the camera response function for NLF estimation; they describe a camera's physical processing as a black box in a single function. [26,27] A few noise studies break down the noise caused by camera electronics and therefore consider more than two noise sources, [7,[28][29][30] but generally "[…] noise sources caused by digital camera electronics are still largely overlooked, despite their significant effect on raw measurement". [28] The works in refs.…”
Section: Noise Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[22][23][24] To account for nonlinear camera processes that affect noise statistics, [25] some works employ the camera response function for NLF estimation; they describe a camera's physical processing as a black box in a single function. [26,27] A few noise studies break down the noise caused by camera electronics and therefore consider more than two noise sources, [7,[28][29][30] but generally "[…] noise sources caused by digital camera electronics are still largely overlooked, despite their significant effect on raw measurement". [28] The works in refs.…”
Section: Noise Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22–24 ] To account for nonlinear camera processes that affect noise statistics, [ 25 ] some works employ the camera response function for NLF estimation; they describe a camera's physical processing as a black box in a single function. [ 26,27 ]…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%