2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9688-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for artery detection in laparoscopic surgery

Abstract: This method is a noninvasive, reliable, and cost-effective technique to detect artery regions, even if some of them are covered with fat or other tissues, while suppressing veins and other tissues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing this work to our previous report [1], we have demonstrated an increase in the sensitivity to 100% (from 95%), and the specificity has increased to 96% (from 92%). In addition, this work uses several different laparoscopic surgeries occurring in different patients, compared to the use of simulated data and the limited number of surgeries (only 2) used in the previous report [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing this work to our previous report [1], we have demonstrated an increase in the sensitivity to 100% (from 95%), and the specificity has increased to 96% (from 92%). In addition, this work uses several different laparoscopic surgeries occurring in different patients, compared to the use of simulated data and the limited number of surgeries (only 2) used in the previous report [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In addition, this work uses several different laparoscopic surgeries occurring in different patients, compared to the use of simulated data and the limited number of surgeries (only 2) used in the previous report [1]. It may be possible to decrease the calculation time using super computers or parallel processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advantages of using MIS include smaller incision size, less pain during the recovery period, reduced blood loss, faster recovery time, shorter hospitalization periods, fewer complications due to infection, better cosmetic results due to less scarring, and improved treatment at reduced cost [1,2]. However, MIS suffers from the loss of tactile sensation and reduced location perception since the surgeon is not allowed to directly palpate the tissue, which can lead to risks including poor surgical outcomes and failure to differentiate target tissues from other tissues [3,4]. For these reasons, it is necessary to use a tactile sensor for MIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%