2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.640338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Method for Using Small Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles to Survey Wildlife Species and Model Their Density Distribution

Abstract: There is growing interest from research and conservation groups in the potential for using small unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs; <2 kg) to conduct wildlife surveys because they are affordable, easy to use, readily available and reliable. However, limitations such as short flight endurance, and in many situations, aviation regulations, have constrained the use of small UAVs in survey applications. Thus, there is a need to refine survey methods adapted to small UAVs that conform to standard operations w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, an important source of information was the structured interviews with key informants, and the possibility of inaccurate recollections of encounters due to failing memories cannot be discounted. Despite their large numbers, clumped dugong groups are often difficult to observe from the air (Preen, 1989; Pollock et al, 2006; Cleguer, 2015; Cleguer et al, 2021; Trotzuk et al, 2022). This is even more complex for boat‐based surveys that depend on surfacing individuals; dugongs resting or feeding underwater make accurately estimating group size a real challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an important source of information was the structured interviews with key informants, and the possibility of inaccurate recollections of encounters due to failing memories cannot be discounted. Despite their large numbers, clumped dugong groups are often difficult to observe from the air (Preen, 1989; Pollock et al, 2006; Cleguer, 2015; Cleguer et al, 2021; Trotzuk et al, 2022). This is even more complex for boat‐based surveys that depend on surfacing individuals; dugongs resting or feeding underwater make accurately estimating group size a real challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this obviously impacts the time needed for surveying a given area, we suspect the requirement of photogrammetric approaches commonly applied on drone data as a reason for the chosen designs. Regulatory restrictions on flying beyond-line-of-sight might further have pushed researchers to embark on such a strategy, focusing on small areas around the takeoff location (Cleguer et al 2021). Early adopters of UAV technology included experimental approaches, such as feature (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manned aerial surveys that cover a representative percentage of the total area currently still constitute the main approach to wildlife population surveys over large spatial scales, though unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may efficiently and reliably fill prevalent shortcomings (Fust and Loos 2020). Despite current legal restrictions (Cleguer et al 2021), the merits of UAV-based surveys include its programmability, which allows surveying predefined complex survey patterns (Cabreira et al 2019), which might be necessary to ensure an even and constant area coverage probability, for example in highly heterogeneous landscapes. An even and constant area coverage probability can be achieved through adjustments of the layout of the flight transects (Strindberg and Buckland 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These versatile platforms offer high data quality and accessibility to remote environments [4][5][6]. In addition, their utility for abundance estimation has been demonstrated for various taxa, including elephants, marine mammals, sea turtles, sharks, jellyfish, and birds [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], yet most studies have relied on either raw counts or corrected indices without accounting for detection errors in the new type of data, i.e., digital imagery in place of direct human observations [14]. Nonetheless, evaluating the factors that influence animal detectability is a prerequisite for solid ecological inference and environmental conservation [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%