2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel modal expansion method for low-order modeling of thermoacoustic instabilities in complex geometries

Abstract: This work proposes an improvement to existing methods based on modal expansions used for the prediction of thermoacoustic instabilities in zero Mach number flow conditions. Whereas the orthogonal basis made of the acoustic eigenmodes of the domain bounded by rigid walls is classically used, an alternative method based on a modal expansion onto an over-complete set of acoustic eigenmodes is proposed. This allows avoiding the misrepresentation of the acoustic velocity field often observed near non rigid-wall bou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies dealing with thermoacoustic instabilities in annular configurations, the time delay between the acoustic field and the heat release rate oscillations has been accounted for in different ways: i) by using the simple n-τ formulation (e.g. [48,19]) and its state-space equivalent [49] for modelling the linear thermoacoustic problem in time and frequency domain, ii) by using measured flame describing functions (e.g. [50,28]) for modelling the nonlinear thermoacoustic problem in frequency domain, and iii) by modelling the flame response to acoustic perturbations with a distribution of time delays [14], or by using state-space representations of experimentally measured FTFs [15,26] for simulating the nonlinear thermoacoustic problem in time domain.…”
Section: Time-delayed Thermoacoustic Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies dealing with thermoacoustic instabilities in annular configurations, the time delay between the acoustic field and the heat release rate oscillations has been accounted for in different ways: i) by using the simple n-τ formulation (e.g. [48,19]) and its state-space equivalent [49] for modelling the linear thermoacoustic problem in time and frequency domain, ii) by using measured flame describing functions (e.g. [50,28]) for modelling the nonlinear thermoacoustic problem in frequency domain, and iii) by modelling the flame response to acoustic perturbations with a distribution of time delays [14], or by using state-space representations of experimentally measured FTFs [15,26] for simulating the nonlinear thermoacoustic problem in time domain.…”
Section: Time-delayed Thermoacoustic Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the work conducted at ONERA over the last decade [11,14,29], high-fidelity Large Eddy Simulations of a representative case are being carried out to confront the results of the ROM, using the CEDRE platform showcased in this study. Finally, the a priori choice of a suitable modal basis is still a current topic of research [25] and will need to be tackled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is typically done by considering the acoustic eigenmodes of the cavity; however, these modes may not be optimal for the disperse phase, which is generally localized in the vicinity of the injectors, thus requiring high-frequency acoustic modes to be properly resolved. Using a specific basis for each variable alleviates this issue and allows better faster spectral convergence [25].…”
Section: Projection Onto Spatial Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low order frequency is harmful to the structure; therefore, the influence of a high order vibration frequency on the threshing cylinder was not considered [31]. The modal analysis of a threshing cylinder in the free state showed that the six degrees of freedom of movement and rotation of the model were unconstrained, and the simulation results showed that the first six rigid body modes had zero natural frequency [32,33].…”
Section: Free Modal Analysis Of Finite Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%