2014 IEEE 28th Convention of Electrical &Amp; Electronics Engineers in Israel (IEEEI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/eeei.2014.7005871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel multicast adaptive logic for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP network

Abstract: Video streaming is now responsible for the majority of Internet traffic and is expected to keep growing over the coming years. Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) [1] is an ISO/IEC MPEG multiquality layer streaming solution that is designed to enable interoperability between servers and clients of different vendors. In the DASH protocol, the client-side player is assumed to have Adaptation Logic (AL). The AL evaluates the various video representation segments available on the server and chooses the mos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They estimated the zapping time (i.e., the time required to switch from one tree to another) to be between 0.794 and 1.177 sec. HMAL [25] presented our first adaptive logic algorithm for multicast networks. However, in this paper we presented a different AL mechanism that is based on deep multicast learning as presented in the next section.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They estimated the zapping time (i.e., the time required to switch from one tree to another) to be between 0.794 and 1.177 sec. HMAL [25] presented our first adaptive logic algorithm for multicast networks. However, in this paper we presented a different AL mechanism that is based on deep multicast learning as presented in the next section.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that MAL performs well for low values of β. To demonstrate MAL's efficiency we compared MAL with two ALs: HMAL [25] and ABMM [29]. Figure IV- show that MAL achieves better eMOS [13] (subjective QoE measure) levels.…”
Section: Performance Under Mobile Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current AL methods [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], estimate the next suitable segment based on estimates of previous segments without taking into account the future network characteristics. However, knowledge of geolocation network conditions can enable better decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%