2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2022.3163143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Noise Filtering Evaluation Criterion of ICESat-2 Signal Photon Data in Forest Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they are not accurate enough to serve as references for complex topographies such as hilly and mountainous terrains. Some existing approaches for quantitative denoising output assessment typically rely on the manual interpretation of Google Earth satellite images to construct validation datasets [ 39 , 40 ]. In this sense, these subjectively labeled references may be imprecise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they are not accurate enough to serve as references for complex topographies such as hilly and mountainous terrains. Some existing approaches for quantitative denoising output assessment typically rely on the manual interpretation of Google Earth satellite images to construct validation datasets [ 39 , 40 ]. In this sense, these subjectively labeled references may be imprecise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, these subjectively labeled references may be imprecise. For this reason, we employed the airborne point cloud with high density as the reference data to evaluate the signal extraction algorithm presented in this work [ 39 ], which provides an increasingly objective benchmark to quantify denoising accuracy. For supplementary validation, the digital terrain model (DTM) and digital surface model (DSM) with a horizontal resolution of 1 m from the airborne LiDAR data of approximately 10 pts/m 2 were used to serve as boundaries for the signal photons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The "DTM − 0.5 m" and "DSM + 0.5 m" are employed as the ground boundary and the top boundary of the canopy, respectively. The points within the boundary of both sides are signal photons, and the points outside the boundary are noise photons [26]. The evaluation indicators used in this study primarily include recall (R), precision (P), and comprehensive evaluation index value (F).…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%