2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel optimal PIλDND2N2 controller using coyote optimization algorithm for an AVR system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is the case for the DC motor, a controller is also required for efficient operation of an AVR system. In that respect, several controller structures such as PID controller (Bingul and Karahan, 2018; Zhou et al, 2019), FOPID controller (Bhookya and Jatoth, 2019; Bhullar et al, 2020b), PID plus second order derivative (PIDD 2 ) controller (Mokeddem and Mirjalili, 2020; Mosaad et al, 2018) and derivatives of PID controller (Moschos and Parisses, in press; Paliwal et al, 2021) along with neural network predictive control (Elsisi, 2019) and state feedback controller (Eke et al, 2021; Gozde, 2020; Mary et al, 2021) have so far been utilized. Similar to the case in DC motors, the PID controller is the most preferred controller for an AVR system, as well (Ayas, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is the case for the DC motor, a controller is also required for efficient operation of an AVR system. In that respect, several controller structures such as PID controller (Bingul and Karahan, 2018; Zhou et al, 2019), FOPID controller (Bhookya and Jatoth, 2019; Bhullar et al, 2020b), PID plus second order derivative (PIDD 2 ) controller (Mokeddem and Mirjalili, 2020; Mosaad et al, 2018) and derivatives of PID controller (Moschos and Parisses, in press; Paliwal et al, 2021) along with neural network predictive control (Elsisi, 2019) and state feedback controller (Eke et al, 2021; Gozde, 2020; Mary et al, 2021) have so far been utilized. Similar to the case in DC motors, the PID controller is the most preferred controller for an AVR system, as well (Ayas, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted on AVRs, which control the output voltage of synchronous generators. These are control methods performed together with various algorithms such as traditional PID implementations [9][10][11][12], cuckoo search algorithm [13], particle swarm optimization [14], coyote optimization algorithm [15], whale optimization algorithm [16,17], nonlinear robust coordinated [18], PSS and H∞ optimization [19] and kidney-inspired algorithm [20]. In addition to traditional PI and PID applications for the control of load frequencies of synchronous generators and power systems, control methods used with different algorithms, artificial intelligence and optimization techniques are also seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two [29] or three [30] higher degrees of freedom controllers have been inspected in this ground of training, which were also of the InOr type. Limited FrOr controllers that have found to be of use are FOPI [31], FOPIDN [32][33][34], and proportional with TIDN [35][36][37][38]. The literature on AGC systems provides an argument about the training of InOr amalgamated controllers (PD-PID) [39], FrOr amalgamated controllers (FOPI-FOPD) [20], and the assemblage of InOr and FrOr controllers (PIDN-FOPD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%