2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-014-1115-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel real-time scheduling algorithm and performance analysis of a MapReduce-based cloud

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also supports prioritizing the tasks which are switched off by default and need to be turned on manually. Different scheduling techniques in Hadoop include deadline-based (Teng et al, 2014), (Morton et al, 2010); locality-aware (Palanisamy et al, 2011), (Arslan et al, 2014), (Wei et al, 2015); situation-aware (Yoo & Sim 2011), delay (Zaharia et al, 2009) (Zaharia & Borthakur et al, 2010), resource-aware (Palanisamy et al, 2011); heterogeneity-aware (Zaharia et al, 2008); network-aware (Ahmad et al, 2014), (Seo et al, 2009); and environment-aware (Zaharia et al, 2008), (Chen et al, 2010) schedulers. (Douglas et al, n.d.) raises the default Hadoop to version 2.0 architecture to a new level by splitting the resource allocation and job scheduling duties from a Job-Tracker to a Resource Manager and Application Master, respectively.…”
Section: H a N I F A N D C L E Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also supports prioritizing the tasks which are switched off by default and need to be turned on manually. Different scheduling techniques in Hadoop include deadline-based (Teng et al, 2014), (Morton et al, 2010); locality-aware (Palanisamy et al, 2011), (Arslan et al, 2014), (Wei et al, 2015); situation-aware (Yoo & Sim 2011), delay (Zaharia et al, 2009) (Zaharia & Borthakur et al, 2010), resource-aware (Palanisamy et al, 2011); heterogeneity-aware (Zaharia et al, 2008); network-aware (Ahmad et al, 2014), (Seo et al, 2009); and environment-aware (Zaharia et al, 2008), (Chen et al, 2010) schedulers. (Douglas et al, n.d.) raises the default Hadoop to version 2.0 architecture to a new level by splitting the resource allocation and job scheduling duties from a Job-Tracker to a Resource Manager and Application Master, respectively.…”
Section: H a N I F A N D C L E Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The schedulers usually try to predict the near-optimal approximation of the deadline for long-running jobs. Authors (Teng et al, 2014) proposed the paused rate monotonic (PRM) scheduling algorithm that defines a certain response time for deadline constraints services of SLA and provisions coexisting service sharing in a cloud environment. It proposes a real-time scheduling technique to deliver broad formulation and theoretical analysis of Hadoop scheduling.…”
Section: Deadline Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brendam Jennings [11] have discussed about the various aspects of resource management challenges in cloud environment. Fei Teng [12] have proposed the Paused Rate Monotonic (PRM) algorithm. In their algorithm they have analyzed performance of hard real time tasks on Map reduce cloud environment in which number of tasks executed by dividing the computations into smaller tasks and combining the results of various tasks.…”
Section: R a Kulkarni Shpatil Nbalajimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is general and impacts in a number of aspects ranging from high level development models to the low-level programming infrastructures. To address this problem, some authors have explored the computational model of Hadoop and proposed scheduling models for map-reduce applications that run in clusters [20,37,38,14]. Most of them advocate for the inclusion of rate-based and deadline-based scheduling into general computing clusters.…”
Section: Real-time Support For Stream Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%