A Novel Secure Cloud SAAS Integration for User Authenticated Information

Satyanarayana, Ch. V. V.; Babu, P. Suryanarayana

doi:10.31142/ijtsrd2227

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For that reason, as an approach focusing on users and user-system interactions, user study is a critical part of IIR research. Indeed, it’s the only way to discover exactly what these users expect, think and need, addressing a variety of research questions that are directly or indirectly related to search system design and evaluation (Liu and Shah, 2019) and bridge the gap between the kind of information services needed and the kind of services in existence (Satyanarayana, 2017). Moreover, it can remove bias by learning about the users from their experiences or perspectives and help to ground design decisions based on a good grip on users’ needs (Yang, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It can induce a deficiency in the research design, data analysis and conclusions if the method is not conducted in the proper process, within the appropriate participants, or under proper circumstances. Even though it has been well designed and carefully conducted, some of these studies still proved to be inadequate to comprehensively reveal the real needs of information users, draw a complete picture of information retrieval behaviors, or sort out the whole process of user-system interactions (Satyanarayana, 2017). The lack of reflection and knowledge on user study limitations may also negatively affect the reusability of the research resources (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reflection on future directions: a systematic review of reported limitations and solutions in interactive information retrieval user studies

Jiang

Liu

2022

AJIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand how users behave and evaluate how systems with users are essential for interactive information retrieval (IIR) research. User study methodology serves as a primary approach to answering IIR research questions. In addition to designing user study procedures, understanding the limitations of varying study designs and discussing solutions to the limitations is also critical for improving the methods and advancing the knowledge in IIR.Design/methodology/approachGiven this unresolved gap, we apply the faceted framework developed by Liu and Shah (2019) in systematically reviewing 131 IIR user studies recently published (2016–2021) on multiple IR and information science venues.FindingsOur study achieve three goals: (1) extracting and synthesizing the reported limitations on multiple aspects of user study (e.g. recruitment, tasks, study procedures, system interfaces, data analysis methods) under associated facets; (2) summarizing the reported solutions to the limitations; (3) clarifying the connections between types of limitations and types of solutions.Practical implicationsThe bibliography of user studies can be used by students and junior researchers who are new to user-centered IR studies as references for study design. Our results can facilitate the reflection and improvement on IR research methodology and serve as a checklist for evaluating customized IIR user studies in varying problem spaces.Originality/valueTo our knowledge, this work is the first study that systematically reviews the study limitations and solutions reported by IIR researchers in articles and empirically examines their connections to different study components.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%