2010
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/24/245501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel solid-state electrochemiluminescence sensor based on Ru(bpy)32 +immobilization on TiO2nanotube arrays and its application for detection of amines in water

Abstract: Many amines are proven or suspected to be carcinogenic and have been implicated in inducing cancer of the bladder. Therefore, the monitoring of their levels in environmental samples is important for the protection of health and the environment. Herein, a novel method for effective immobilization of Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) on the electrode surface of TiO(2) nanotube arrays (TNs) is developed for the first time. The method involves Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) spontaneously adsorbed on the surface of negatively charged TiO(2) nanotube… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the ECL‐potential curves at Ru‐Cu‐TN and Ru‐TN electrodes. The redox waves corresponding to the Ru 3+ /Ru 2+ couple were not clearly observed at the Ru‐Cu‐TN (shown in the inset of Figure 5b) and Ru‐TN electrodes, similar to the previous report 19, presumably due to the overlap of the current. It is presumably caused by the rapid increase of anodic current above ca.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 5 shows the ECL‐potential curves at Ru‐Cu‐TN and Ru‐TN electrodes. The redox waves corresponding to the Ru 3+ /Ru 2+ couple were not clearly observed at the Ru‐Cu‐TN (shown in the inset of Figure 5b) and Ru‐TN electrodes, similar to the previous report 19, presumably due to the overlap of the current. It is presumably caused by the rapid increase of anodic current above ca.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast to pure TNs and Cu‐TNs, both Ru‐TNs and Ru‐Cu‐TNs exhibit two new absorption peaks at ca. 285 and 450 nm, which are consistent with electronic π–π* transition and metal‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer ( MLCT) transition (dπ→π*) of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ 19,43, respectively. The above results suggest that Ru(bpy) 3 2+ has been successfully immobilized on TNs and Cu‐TNs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations