2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Solution for Venous Congestion Following Digital Replantation: A Proximally Based Cross-Finger Flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,29 A study of cross-finger flaps for the treatment of venous congestion following digit replantation used the Aesthetics domain along with the Pain domain. 30 Only 4 studies used the MHQ as the sole outcome measure. Virtually all other studies include functional measures, such as strength or motion or radiographic measures, and many included additional subjective measures, most frequently the SF-36.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,29 A study of cross-finger flaps for the treatment of venous congestion following digit replantation used the Aesthetics domain along with the Pain domain. 30 Only 4 studies used the MHQ as the sole outcome measure. Virtually all other studies include functional measures, such as strength or motion or radiographic measures, and many included additional subjective measures, most frequently the SF-36.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, several options exist, including anastomotic revision, interposition vein grafting, and nonsurgical modalities (leech therapy, heparin-induced bleeding, systemic anticoagulation, etc.). 15,25,29,30,38 To date, there has not been a thorough investigation on their efficacy in secondary revascularization. In our study, we found that replants complicated by venous compromise had higher survival rates if managed with interposition vein grafts (vs. vein revision and nonsurgical modalities).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies indicate that arterial insufficiency is a common cause for digit replantation failure, [11][12][13][14] whereas others cite venous issues. 9,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Furthermore, the optimal treatment modality following vascular compromise is not well described in the literature. Ultimately, a better understanding of the incidence, etiology, and survival rates following vascular compromise after replantation can help guide decision-making and improve outcomes following amputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development and perfection of microsurgical technique, gradual maturity of small vascular anastomosis technique in clinical medicine and the increasingly higher requirement of people for modern life quality, people have had higher and higher requirements of severed finger replantation due to the serious impact of severed finger on the appearance, function, psychology and normal communication of patients ( 9 , 10 ). Therefore, it was found in clinical medicine on the basis of body anatomy that there are direct communicating branches between the branch and vein of dorsal digital artery, and it is difficult for the corresponding supply of finger blood to return through the vein when the physiological reflux veins disappear ( 11 ); but the proximal digital arterial ligation after one-side anastomosis can reduce the arterial blood perfusion of the replanted finger to a certain extent, buffer the venous return load, and form a new blood circulation from the dorsal digital arterial branches to the dorsal digital veins ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%