2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel surrogate model to support building energy labelling system: A new approach to assess cooling energy demand in commercial buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques were applied in articles focusing on almost all types of investigation within this field, as can be seen in the analysis of the key terms topic. For example, to estimate the energy performance of buildings (Melo et al 2016); to understand the influential characteristics of energy consumption in buildings (Ma and Cheng 2016); and for prediction of the energy consumption of buildings (Zhou et al 2016).…”
Section: Identifying the Data Analysis Techniques Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques were applied in articles focusing on almost all types of investigation within this field, as can be seen in the analysis of the key terms topic. For example, to estimate the energy performance of buildings (Melo et al 2016); to understand the influential characteristics of energy consumption in buildings (Ma and Cheng 2016); and for prediction of the energy consumption of buildings (Zhou et al 2016).…”
Section: Identifying the Data Analysis Techniques Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, metamodels have become increasingly popular in the field of energy sources because of their significant advantages in reducing the computational cost of time-consuming tasks [1,2]. Melo et al [3] pointed out that researchers in many countries are developing metamodels to estimate the energy performance of the building stock. Bornatico et al [4] used a kind of metamodel to optimize energy systems, and found that the metamodel converged to the same solution at 150 times the speed of the fine model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the sample is problem-dependent [16], and it can varies from 2.2× [17,18] to 4166.6×the number of design variables [19] in different BPS applications. Actually, until today, the correct size of the sample for a given building has to be determined by trial and error, which may seriously compromise the advantages of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%