2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40651-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Tabletop and Tablet-Based Display System to Support Learner-Centric Ophthalmic Anatomy Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed a trend whereby the participants perceived the mobile AR solution to be more usable than the one with the ophthalmoscope replica but less usable when compared to the EYEsi DOS. Another example employs a tangible user interface and an AR-based approach that allows multiple trainees to interact with an eye fundus displayed on both the screen and mobile devices [12].…”
Section: Mobile Ar and Vr Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results showed a trend whereby the participants perceived the mobile AR solution to be more usable than the one with the ophthalmoscope replica but less usable when compared to the EYEsi DOS. Another example employs a tangible user interface and an AR-based approach that allows multiple trainees to interact with an eye fundus displayed on both the screen and mobile devices [12].…”
Section: Mobile Ar and Vr Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR-and AR-based DO simulators require input devices that are representative of the direct ophthalmoscope, and the choice of input device can have a significant impact on the ease of use of the entire simulation. The potential impact of interaction techniques on VR-and AR-based DO simulators has led us to explore usability issues associated with mobile AR used in combination with a Styrofoam head, and a 3D-printed direct ophthalmoscope replica as alternative tangible user interfaces [11], tabletop displays for multiuser visualization, interaction and augmentation [12], and early prototyping of VR DO eye examination [4]. Despite recent advances in custom-made user interfaces employing 3D printing and open electronics, virtual simulators continue to employ off-the-shelf VR controllers and gestural inputs that may impact usability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%