2000
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.20.8.2676-2686.2000
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Transcriptional Repression Domain Mediates p21WAF1/CIP1 Induction of p300 Transactivation

Abstract: The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein (CBP) are important regulators of the cell cycle, differentiation, and tumorigenesis. Both p300 and CBP are targeted by viral oncoproteins, are mutated in certain forms of cancer, are phosphorylated in a cell cycle-dependent manner, interact with transcription factors such as p53 and E2F, and can be found complexed with cyclinE-Cdk2 in vivo. Moreover, p300-deficient cells show defects in proliferation. Here we demonstrate that transcriptional activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
123
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the reduced p21 protein levels in TGCT cells upon cisplatin treatment are predominantly due to the reduced p21 gene transcription in TGCTs. We can, however, not exclude the involvement of p21 proteasomal degradation, because p21 protein can also stimulate its own transcription by stimulating p300 transactivation of p53 (Snowden et al, 2000). Whether a reduced p53 transcriptional activity, as suggested above, is indeed responsible for the low p21 mRNA levels and not a decreased stability of the p21 mRNA has not been proven yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, the reduced p21 protein levels in TGCT cells upon cisplatin treatment are predominantly due to the reduced p21 gene transcription in TGCTs. We can, however, not exclude the involvement of p21 proteasomal degradation, because p21 protein can also stimulate its own transcription by stimulating p300 transactivation of p53 (Snowden et al, 2000). Whether a reduced p53 transcriptional activity, as suggested above, is indeed responsible for the low p21 mRNA levels and not a decreased stability of the p21 mRNA has not been proven yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the myeloid lineage, this may be related to direct protein ± protein interactions of p21 with C/EBPalpha (Harris et al, 2001) and with Stat 3 (Coqueret and Gascan, 2000), both of which are required for granulocytic di erentiation (McLemore et al, 2001;Wang et al, 1999). p21 also binds to the p300 transcriptional adapter and alters its activity (Coqueret and Gascan, 2000;Snowden et al, 2000) ; in addition, p21 binds directly to E2F and downmodulates E2F-1 dependent transcription (Delavaine and La Thangue, 1999); Genetic analysis suggests that this could be highly pertinent to di erentiation control (Muller et al, 2001). Hox genes are highly directive of di erentiation and may be among transcriptional targets modulated by p21-complexes .…”
Section: Involvement Of P21 In Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p300 contains a repression domain called cell cycle regulatory domain 1 (36), which is conserved in other proteins like the erythroblast transformation-specific domain and transcription factor ELK-1 as well, (37) and is able to actively repress transcription (36) in a manner that is dependent on the abundance of activating or repressing transcription factors. Furthermore, other mechanisms of transcriptional repression by CREM are possible and could include glycosylation or methylation of p300, CBP, or histones as well as a recruitment of inhibitors of transcription like histone deacetylating proteins (38 -40).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%