2005
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment

Abstract: A new human head phantom has been proposed by CENELEC/IEEE, based on a large scale anthropometric survey. This phantom is compared to a homogeneous Generic Head Phantom and three high resolution anatomical head models with respect to specific absorption rate (SAR) assessment. The head phantoms are exposed to the radiation of a generic mobile phone (GMP) with different antenna types and a commercial mobile phone. The phones are placed in the standardized testing positions and operate at 900 and 1800 MHz. The av… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the cell size is selected, the maximum time step is determined by the Courant stability condition [Taflove and Hagness, 2000]. The method has been successfully used in numerous studies for calculating SAR in MRI-based human head and whole-body models at near-and farfields [e.g., Qingxiang et al, 2004;Christ et al, 2005;Martínez-Búrdalo et al, 2005], as well as for calculating induced currents [Furse and Gandhi, 1998]. In this article, the FDTD method is employed using the integrated simulation platform XFDTD produced by REMCOM (State College, PA), using perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary conditions with eight layers at the limits of the computational space to avoid undesired reflections [Berenger, 1994].…”
Section: Methodology and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the cell size is selected, the maximum time step is determined by the Courant stability condition [Taflove and Hagness, 2000]. The method has been successfully used in numerous studies for calculating SAR in MRI-based human head and whole-body models at near-and farfields [e.g., Qingxiang et al, 2004;Christ et al, 2005;Martínez-Búrdalo et al, 2005], as well as for calculating induced currents [Furse and Gandhi, 1998]. In this article, the FDTD method is employed using the integrated simulation platform XFDTD produced by REMCOM (State College, PA), using perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary conditions with eight layers at the limits of the computational space to avoid undesired reflections [Berenger, 1994].…”
Section: Methodology and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only Schönborn et al [1998], Christ et al [2005], and Kainz et al [in press] use anatomically correct head models generated from MRI scans of children. Different source types such as dipoles, generic mobile phones with monopole and helical antennas as well as complex CAD based models of real world phones were applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although only IEEE [2004] provides a relaxation of limits for pinna, it also states that this relaxation has to be considered without violating the general provisions. It is known that if the limited SAR values for the head tissue are met, the values for the pinna treated as an extremity are intrinsically met as well [Christ et al, 2005]. To minimize pinna discrepancies when performing the simulations, the BLAS model has an ear completely attached to the head, as can be observed from Figures 1 and 9, that is, we use what some works call a ''compressed'' or ''collapsed'' pinna.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The simplified EPI model is useful for algorithm validation purposes since SAR values are not directly linked to head size [Christ et al, 2005].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%