2005
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children

Abstract: There has been a long and controversial debate on possible differences in electromagnetic (EM) energy absorption between adults and children during cell phone usage. Some published studies report higher specific absorption rate (SAR) in children and explain this based on smaller head size. More recently, age dependent changes of the dielectric tissue parameters have again ignited the discussion. This study intends to give a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge about the parameters and mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a case of mobile phones, of the main concern was the interaction between terminal antennas and a human head [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case of mobile phones, of the main concern was the interaction between terminal antennas and a human head [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first study dealt with electric fields. Various reports were presented on the reduction of pineal melatonin and N-acetyl transferee (NAT) and synthesis of melatonin enzyme, when exposed to electric fields for about for one month 22 hours a day [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Other studies did not find any biological effects because of exposure to electromagnetic field [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field is related to the current that flows through the electric wire. The magnetic field intensity is commonly expressed in microtesla (μT) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not supported by scientific facts. From the exposure point of view, carefully conducted theoretical dosimetry studies have shown that there is no evidence for a correlation between energy absorption and head size [16,17]. Other factors such as shape of the head, tissue distribution and antenna position are more important factors affecting specific absorption rate (SAR).…”
Section: Rf Energy and Central Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%