2006
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:2006134080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical investigation of dispersion in Hopkinson Pressure Bar experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is only possible to model an approximation of an infinitely-long pressure bar, the errors introduced by deviating from a true infinite bar can be minimised by windowing the forcing functions to reduce the inertial effects 1 introduced by the sudden application of stress at a free face [20,26], or by enforcing zero displacement boundary conditions for a small length of bar equal to the wavelength of the forcing function [28].…”
Section: Initial Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While it is only possible to model an approximation of an infinitely-long pressure bar, the errors introduced by deviating from a true infinite bar can be minimised by windowing the forcing functions to reduce the inertial effects 1 introduced by the sudden application of stress at a free face [20,26], or by enforcing zero displacement boundary conditions for a small length of bar equal to the wavelength of the forcing function [28].…”
Section: Initial Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation of mass in either a lumped or consistent matrix will give rise to spurious oscillations [29], and the central-differencing explicit time-stepping algorithm used in most finite element solvers will give rise to oscillations that are indistinguishable from Pochhammer-Chree dispersion [28]. The results from a finite element model may therefore begin to diverge from theory, particularly when considering cumulative numerical losses associated with propagating higher frequencies (relative to mesh size) over long distances.…”
Section: Initial Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element modelling of Kolsky bar has been extensively reported in previous studies, e.g., for the determination of incident pulse shaping design [15,16], modelling of pulse shaper [17], for numerical verification of the apparatus design [18], misalignment effect in the loading bars [19], and investigation on wave dispersion in bars [20]. This study aims to provide comprehensive methodology to model elastomers in a Kolsky bar experiment with a focus on specimen geometry optimization, experimental verification, and pulse shaper geometry effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) is the most widely used method to describe the results of different material samples exposed to medium and high speed shaping [26][27][28][29][30][31]. The best described SHPB process induces unidirectional pressure in the target sample by the simultaneous opposing impact of two bars.…”
Section: Materials Models For Virtual Ballistic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%