1988
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7930(88)90014-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for treating strongly interactive three-dimensional viscous—inviscid flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There fore, we look for a numerical solution of the above equations. To avoid numerical instabilities, Smith [23] proposed a unique finite-difference technique to solve the above equations, which was later extended by Bodonyi and Duck [24]. Using the same approach as taken by them, a finite-difference program based on the modified Keller box method [25] has been developed to solve for the steady flow.…”
Section: Steady-state Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There fore, we look for a numerical solution of the above equations. To avoid numerical instabilities, Smith [23] proposed a unique finite-difference technique to solve the above equations, which was later extended by Bodonyi and Duck [24]. Using the same approach as taken by them, a finite-difference program based on the modified Keller box method [25] has been developed to solve for the steady flow.…”
Section: Steady-state Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid for the streamwise variable X is the same as that for the lower-deck boundary-layer equations; the grid in the wall-normal direction is of course different. The numerical method is the same as described in Bodonyi & Duck (1988), where further details can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendix C. The method of solving numerically the Laplace equation for the pressure An alternative approach to handle the divergence of the integral in the P-D law is to solve numerically the pressure equation in the upper deck simultaneously with the boundary-layer equations in the lower deck, as was suggested by Bodonyi & Duck (1988). In terms of X and the wall-normal coordinate for the upper deck (Smith 1989) y = λ 5/4 (1 − M 2 ) 7/8 C −3/8 (T w /T ∞ ) −3/2 y * /( 3 L), ( The Laplace equation (C 2) for the pressure is solved in the domain: X 0 X X I and 0 ȳ ȳ K .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smith (1983) (extended by Bodonyi and Duck 1988) presented a finite-difference scheme for treating flows of this type, using a system of rotated coordinates, enabling the problem to be made quasi -two-dimensional. …”
Section: (1980)mentioning
confidence: 99%