2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4941068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A one-piece 3D printed flexure translation stage for open-source microscopy

Abstract: Open source hardware has the potential to revolutionise the way we build scientific instruments; with the advent of readily-available 3D printers, mechanical designs can now be shared, improved and replicated faster and more easily than ever before. However, printed parts are typically plastic and often perform poorly compared to traditionally machined mechanisms. We have overcome many of the limitations of 3D printed mechanisms by exploiting the compliance of the plastic to produce a monolithic 3D printed fle… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
126
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
126
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SwingScope project also fits within and benefits from the the open source do-it-yourself (DIY) approaches in terms of functionality and assemblability. For example, many publications listed in the PLOS collection on Open Source Toolkit:Hardware [48] can be incorporated into this microscope design to enable functionality and cost savings [2, 41, 4951]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SwingScope project also fits within and benefits from the the open source do-it-yourself (DIY) approaches in terms of functionality and assemblability. For example, many publications listed in the PLOS collection on Open Source Toolkit:Hardware [48] can be incorporated into this microscope design to enable functionality and cost savings [2, 41, 4951]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show how the components used in the lab-prototype could be used in a device more suitable for field deployment and that has even lower infrastructure requirements, we also performed a subset of the measurements using an open source 3D printable microscope designed by Water Scope [22]. This microscope uses a Raspberry Pi camera V2 with the camera's lens removed, reversed and mounted at a greater distance from the sensor than in conventional use.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of the Flexiscope without any motion control elements is ~€11,000. Depending on your requirements other excellent motion control systems have been devised by Campbell et al (2014) and Sharkey et al (2016). It should also be noted that while Matlab was available to all staff and students in our institution this may not be the case in other institutions and this cost should be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Cost Breakdownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With flexibility and funding limitations in mind, many researchers have devised excellent cost-saving strategies which include 3D printed microscopes and XYZ translators (Sharkey et al, 2016), (Baden et al, 2015) (Maia Chagas et al, 2017), (Stewart and Giannini, 2016), a $0.58 origami microscope (Cybulski et al, 2014), and modifications to old microscopes (Peidle et al, 2009), (Hernández Vera et al, 2016), (Stewart and Giannini, 2016). These types of systems are advantageous in the field or within incubators but their low cost often equates to a compromise in image quality and a lack of long term stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%