2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A package for the automated classification of images containing supernova light echoes

Abstract: Context. The so-called light echoes of supernovae -the apparent motion of outburst-illuminated interstellar dust -can be detected in astronomical difference images; however, light echoes are extremely rare which makes manual detection an arduous task. Surveys for centuries-old supernova light echoes can involve hundreds of pointings of wide-field imagers wherein the subimages from each CCD amplifier require examination. Aims. We introduce ALED, a Python package that implements (i) a capsule network trained to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the final results reported for our model are on the median across the 6 cross-validation sets, while it appears that ALED did not perform cross validation. On a single set, our precision and recall can be as high as 0.9 simultaneously (see Figure 9), but perhaps the most fair comparison is that with the model reported in table 4 of Bhullar et al (2021) as "ALED-m": a precision P = 1, and a recall R = 0.25. When taking the median across all cross-validation sets, at P median = 1 we measure R median = 0.3 for score and IoP thresholds of 0.7 and 0.2 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the final results reported for our model are on the median across the 6 cross-validation sets, while it appears that ALED did not perform cross validation. On a single set, our precision and recall can be as high as 0.9 simultaneously (see Figure 9), but perhaps the most fair comparison is that with the model reported in table 4 of Bhullar et al (2021) as "ALED-m": a precision P = 1, and a recall R = 0.25. When taking the median across all cross-validation sets, at P median = 1 we measure R median = 0.3 for score and IoP thresholds of 0.7 and 0.2 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Both our model and ALED (Bhullar et al 2021), the only other automated LE detection method we are aware of, can achieves a high (P ∼ 90%) precision and high recall (R ∼ 90%) although, since the models were applied to different datasets, it is not straightforward to compare their performance at this time. We note that the final results reported for our model are on the median across the 6 cross-validation sets, while it appears that ALED did not perform cross validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deep neural networks (DNNs) have recently been used in the detection and study of astronomical sources, including the detection of galaxy clusters (Chan & Stott 2019), gravitational lenses (Davies et al 2019), supernova remnants (Liu et al 2019), and more. DNNs have also been applied to the detection of LEs in Bhullar et al (2021). This work produced a sliding-window detection model, ALED, which is based on a capsule CNN architecture (Sabour et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%