2019
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2019.2892975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parallel Gaussian–Bernoulli Restricted Boltzmann Machine for Mining Area Classification With Hyperspectral Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the proposed method with SVM [15] and several state-of-the-art methods: 3D-CNN [22], ResNet [24], SSRN [31], DFFN [32], and MPRN [33].…”
Section: Classification Results Of Hyperspectral Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the proposed method with SVM [15] and several state-of-the-art methods: 3D-CNN [22], ResNet [24], SSRN [31], DFFN [32], and MPRN [33].…”
Section: Classification Results Of Hyperspectral Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a typical deep learning model, the stacked autoencoder (SAE) [19,20] can extract both spatial and spectral information and then fuse them for HSI classification. Deep belief networks (DBN) [21] and restricted Boltzmann machines [22] have been proposed for combining spatial information and spectral information of HSIs. However, all of the above methods use one-dimensional feature vectors as the input and do not fully utilize the spatial features in HSIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a great number of samples, unsupervised learning method gradually becomes an operational approach to machine learning. RBM is an unsupervised mapping learning method, which includes the input layer and hidden layer, and the connection between them is a full connection [ 23 ]. There is a connection weight between any two nodes in RBM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average GS of all the feature bands are used to determine the best image segmentation scale, where the optimal segmentation scale is identified as the one with the lowest average GS value. For the experimental data, the segmentation scales of three datasets are set to [30,35,40,45,50], [25,30,35,40,45] and [25,30,35,40,45], respectively. The results on different segmentation scale are shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Multi-resolution Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%