2016
DOI: 10.1515/tjb-2016-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A paraprotein interference and its management in clinical laboratory / Bir paraprotein interferansı vakasının klinik laboratuvarda yönetimi

Abstract: In the present study we describe a patient who has interference due to paraproteinemia in her labaratory results. In a patient with a total protein concentration of 10.8 g/dL, a direct bilirubin result higher than total was detected. She also had discordant results in her whole blood count parameters. Further investigation was performed on this patient. Presence of any cold agglutinin and cryoglobulin was tested and excluded first. After 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) treatment, patient was idendified as Ig-M Kappa … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) interference in a sample on one platform is non-transferable to the other in the above instances corresponding measurements in the other wet chemistry platform correlated well with the dry chemistry results; 3) interference is not to the concentration of the measurand, in this case, bilirubin and 4) interference is not proportional to the amount of paraproteins present, as the absolute percentage variation of the wet chemistry vis-á-vis dry chemistry results does not correlate inversely with the A/G ratio (Table 3). As explained by King et al (30) and Madenci et al (31), such interferences in bilirubin measurement by diazotization are usually due to precipitation of proteins in the extremely acidic pH of the reaction mixture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) interference in a sample on one platform is non-transferable to the other in the above instances corresponding measurements in the other wet chemistry platform correlated well with the dry chemistry results; 3) interference is not to the concentration of the measurand, in this case, bilirubin and 4) interference is not proportional to the amount of paraproteins present, as the absolute percentage variation of the wet chemistry vis-á-vis dry chemistry results does not correlate inversely with the A/G ratio (Table 3). As explained by King et al (30) and Madenci et al (31), such interferences in bilirubin measurement by diazotization are usually due to precipitation of proteins in the extremely acidic pH of the reaction mixture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%