1994
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(94)90013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pareto comparison of ad valorem and unit taxes in noncompetitive environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
81
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus one might expect consumer prices to be lower under ad valorem than under specific taxation. Indeed, it is possible to show, in the monopoly case, that replacing a specific tax, t s , by its ad valorem equivalent, t a =t s /p, causes consumer prices to fall and tax revenue and monopoly profits to rise (Skeath and Trandel, 1994). So everyone gains from ad valorem taxationexcept the public health advocate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus one might expect consumer prices to be lower under ad valorem than under specific taxation. Indeed, it is possible to show, in the monopoly case, that replacing a specific tax, t s , by its ad valorem equivalent, t a =t s /p, causes consumer prices to fall and tax revenue and monopoly profits to rise (Skeath and Trandel, 1994). So everyone gains from ad valorem taxationexcept the public health advocate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…treatments, see Delipalla and Keen (1992) and Skeath and Trandel (1994), though the latter paper is subject to the usual criticisms associated with the use of a partial equilibrium framework for the study of a tax problem. The …rst result in favor of ad valorem appears to be Wicksell (1959) (originally published in 1896) who considered the case of monopoly under partial equilibrium.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suits and Musgrave (1953) show that tax revenues resulting from a unit tax are lower than from an ad valorem tax, assuming tax rates which induce a monopolist to produce the same output. Skeath and Trandel (1994a), furthermore, make clear that the ad valorem tax Pareto-dominates a specific tax of equal yield. The analyses have been extended to monopolistic competition (Cheung 1998;Schröder 2004), oligopolies (Delipalla and Keen 1992;Denicolò and Matteuzzi 2000), and to frameworks in which firms can become informal and will then not pay taxes (Delipalla 2009a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%