1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01096412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A penalty function approach for solving bi-level linear programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cutting-plane methods found in literature are essentially based on Tuy's concavity cuts (Tuy, 1964). White and Anandalingam (1993) use these cuts in a penalty function approach for solving bilevel linear programs. Marcotte et al (1993) propose a cutting-plane algorithm for solving bilevel linear programs with a guarantee of finite termination.…”
Section: Bilevel Optimization Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutting-plane methods found in literature are essentially based on Tuy's concavity cuts (Tuy, 1964). White and Anandalingam (1993) use these cuts in a penalty function approach for solving bilevel linear programs. Marcotte et al (1993) propose a cutting-plane algorithm for solving bilevel linear programs with a guarantee of finite termination.…”
Section: Bilevel Optimization Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second branch-and-bound algorithm, which branches on binding follower constraints, was proposed by Hansen et al (1992). Besides that, also penalty function methods, which add the duality gap to the objective 2.2 Benders decomposition function, were introduced (White and Anandalingam, 1993). Saharidis and Ierapetritou (2009) proposed an algorithm based on BD (see Section 2.2) for the DCLBP.…”
Section: Bilevel Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, several algorithms of this sort have been proposed for the MPEC. Among these, branch-and-bound algorithms [2,9], a penalty technique [24] and a sequential complementarity method [12] are considered to be the most efficient procedures to perform this task. A number of local methods [6-8, 10, 14, 16, 22] have also been recently developed to find stationary points for the MPEC.…”
Section: Mpecmentioning
confidence: 99%