2019
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqy019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Penchant for the Immoral: Implications of Parasocial Interaction, Perceived Complicity, and Identification on Liking of Anti-Heroes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, viewers might be less inclined to rate favorite antiheroes as villainous because it might arouse cog-nitive dissonance (e.g., "Why would I like a character I perceive to be 'bad'?"). This fits with literature showing that liking or enjoying an antihero character is associated with increased perceptions of that character's morality (Eden et al, 2017;Oliver et al, 2019). On the other hand, if viewers see themselves as antisocial (e.g., aggressive, Machiavellian), they may find more villainous characters to be more self-relevant, validating, or even aspirational.…”
Section: The Present Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, viewers might be less inclined to rate favorite antiheroes as villainous because it might arouse cog-nitive dissonance (e.g., "Why would I like a character I perceive to be 'bad'?"). This fits with literature showing that liking or enjoying an antihero character is associated with increased perceptions of that character's morality (Eden et al, 2017;Oliver et al, 2019). On the other hand, if viewers see themselves as antisocial (e.g., aggressive, Machiavellian), they may find more villainous characters to be more self-relevant, validating, or even aspirational.…”
Section: The Present Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The currently ubiquitous antihero—defined loosely as a “morally complex” protagonist whose “actions range on a continuum from good to bad, in contrast with clearly moral heroes and clearly immoral villains” (Janicke & Raney, 2017, p. 534)—has received recent attention in the field of media psychology (Janicke & Raney, 2017; Krakowiak, 2015; Krakowiak & Oliver, 2012; Oliver et al, 2019; Sanders & Tsay-Vogel, 2016; Shafer & Raney, 2012; Snyder et al, 2019). Researchers have typically operationalized antiheroes as lone wolf-style vigilantes who use callous methods to fight more traditional “bad guys” (e.g., Dexter in Dexter— forensic analyst by day, serial killer of murderers by night).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the dynamic representation of the persona, PSI and its facets are subject to constant change (Schramm and Wirth 2010 ). Studies have shown that strong PSI processes lead to higher engagement and enjoyment in digital technologies (Tsay-Vogel and Schwartz 2014 ), stronger identification with media characters (even with amoral personas; Oliver et al 2019 ), while PSI is also correlated with persuasiveness (Rosaen et al 2019 ). Considering these multiple influences of parasocial processes on individual learners, the theory of PSI should be considered when discussing educational processes in digital environments.…”
Section: Fundamental Theories On Social Processes In Digital Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, researchers have proposed that in the context of morally complex characters, identification may facilitate narrative enjoyment and attitudinal change (Meier & Neubaum, 2019;Oliver et al, 2019;Raney et al, 2009;Tsay & Krakowiak, 2011). Because identification involves a merging of the self with the character, audiences who identify with a morally complex character may be particularly motivated to interpret the character's actions in a favorable light.…”
Section: Character Categorizations and Moral Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because identification involves a merging of the self with the character, audiences who identify with a morally complex character may be particularly motivated to interpret the character's actions in a favorable light. Thus, Oliver et al (2019) and Raney et al (2009) argue that identification with a character is likely to encourage moral biases in favor of the character, promoting disengagement from moral standards that might typically condemn the character's actions (i.e., moral disengagement; see Raney, 2004 1 ).…”
Section: Character Categorizations and Moral Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%