2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1067413617050113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A performance appraisal of size dependent reproduction and reproductive allocation: A case study of two Inula species from Kashmir Himalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decline would be inevitable if more and more carbon were being diverted to ever-increasing V MASW per unit leaf area. Yet reproductive output tends to be proportional to crown area, volume, or vegetative biomass and, far from decreasing, keeps pace with plant size (Thompson et al 1991;Thomas 1996;Greene & Johnson 2004;Weiner 2004;Shabir et al 2017). This continual tracking of reproductive output with size would be impossible if the amount of surplus carbon that could be directed to reproduction decreased with plant size, as would necessarily occur if V MASW increased relative to leaf area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decline would be inevitable if more and more carbon were being diverted to ever-increasing V MASW per unit leaf area. Yet reproductive output tends to be proportional to crown area, volume, or vegetative biomass and, far from decreasing, keeps pace with plant size (Thompson et al 1991;Thomas 1996;Greene & Johnson 2004;Weiner 2004;Shabir et al 2017). This continual tracking of reproductive output with size would be impossible if the amount of surplus carbon that could be directed to reproduction decreased with plant size, as would necessarily occur if V MASW increased relative to leaf area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproductive allometry related to plant size is thought to be due to environmental variability and is interpreted as an adaptive strategy of plant growth and allocation (Bonser & Aarssen, 2009). Allocating more biomass to functions that maximize vegetative growth is more common under harsh environments (Shabir et al, 2017). For small individuals, large resource investment in reproduction may have a negative influence on future reproduction, growth, or survival (Obeso, 2002;Shibata & Kudo, 2016 of allocation therefore implies trade-offs for T. caespitosum in harsh alpine environments because resources allocated to one function or organ are not available to other functions or organs (Weiner, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, studies examining reproductive allocation need to consider the potential effect of size‐related variation in cushion species. After all, study of size dependence of fitness components is usually the only way to apply life history theory predictions to most herbaceous perennials due to the difficulty in evaluating the age of these plants except where long‐term demographic studies are conducted (Shabir, Nawchoo, & Wani, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%