2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-017-0447-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Permeability-Measuring Magnetic Flux Leakage Method for Inner Surface Crack in Thick-Walled Steel Pipe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the P-MFL test method has a higher sensitivity and a large detection range, compared to the conventional MFL test method. To illustrate the advantage of the P-MFL method, a crack with depth 1 mm, and 0.5 mm width was taken in a 14.5 mm thickness sample [12].…”
Section: Pipe Cracks Detection Methods -A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the P-MFL test method has a higher sensitivity and a large detection range, compared to the conventional MFL test method. To illustrate the advantage of the P-MFL method, a crack with depth 1 mm, and 0.5 mm width was taken in a 14.5 mm thickness sample [12].…”
Section: Pipe Cracks Detection Methods -A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More important, an electromagnet is used, flowing through the single coil, from a multi-track loop, where the loop produces a magnetic field required for detection [12].…”
Section: Cracks Detection By Use Of a Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, a finite element analysis was performed in order to obtain the transient configuration of the SCFCL, then the expression of the flow density was obtained by adjusting the curve and, finally, the losses were calculated using the analytical model. Works related to the inspection area by nondestructive techniques presented by Fabrice Foucher et al [13], Zhiyang Deng et al [14] and Satoru Horai et al [15] show the use of finite element analysis methods for the case of eddy currents with magnetic saturation through an external DC field. These were developed by separating the problem into two stages, in the first it analyzed only the interaction of the DC field with the material in order to obtain the distribution of magnetic permeability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is frequently utilized for the inspection of pipelines or tubes [ 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 15 , 16 ], train wheels and axles or rail tracks [ 9 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], steel wire ropes [ 10 , 11 , 20 ], storage tanks [ 15 , 21 ], or steel construction elements [ 2 , 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. The method is suitable for detecting various types of surface, subsurface, and surface-breaking deeper defects in magnetic materials such as metal loss [ 2 , 10 , 11 , 20 ], fatigue damage cracks [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 16 ], pitting corrosion [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 ], or plastic deformation [ 1 , 15 , 24 , 25 ]. The relatively small dimensions of the detectors of leaking magnetic flux allow us to apply the method to examine both the external sides [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] of the tested objects and the internal sides such as the inner wall of a pipe or hollow axle [ 1 , ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is suitable for detecting various types of surface, subsurface, and surface-breaking deeper defects in magnetic materials such as metal loss [ 2 , 10 , 11 , 20 ], fatigue damage cracks [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 16 ], pitting corrosion [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 ], or plastic deformation [ 1 , 15 , 24 , 25 ]. The relatively small dimensions of the detectors of leaking magnetic flux allow us to apply the method to examine both the external sides [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] of the tested objects and the internal sides such as the inner wall of a pipe or hollow axle [ 1 , 6 , 8 , 16 , 19 ]. One of the main advantages of the method is the lack of need for direct contact between the inspected element and the sensing device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%